Batman: The Chalice, 4.45 stars out of 5
Batman:War on Crime 4.42 stars out of 5
Superman: Son of Superman, 4.4 out of 5
Stars.
You have several or so high priced
choices for your Christmas stocking stuffer: Neil Gaimans new Dreams Graphic novel, two,
count em two, Batman graphic novels and one Superman Elseworlds story penned by the
legendary Howard Chaykin that goes for a whopping $24 bucks or so.
k((Part of the cover of Son of Superman)
Well, the reviews are in. And they're
mostly good.
If youre as fantastically wealthy as
I am (I once dreamed of buying some stock, thus, I must be wealthy by default, small Matt
Drudge apartment aside), then I would recommend buying all of em up, with the exception of
that Neil Gaiman book, but more on that later.
The best two were the two stories
featuring Batman, with the one featuring Superman coming in a close third (see above). I
kind of liked the Dixon/Van Fleet Batman story the most. It was written by, and
theres no nice way to say this, notorious hack Chuck DixonThe Bill Mantlo of
the modern age--and drawn by John Van Fleet, who you might remember for those very cool
Typhoid Mary covers from awhile back. To defend Dixon just a bit since Ive opened up
by maligning him, hes capable of writing very very good stories and "The
Chalice" is one of them. Past work by him that Ive admired includes a story
about biotech experiments on prisoners gone bad (I cant remember the title but the
artist there was great too: Jorge Zaffino.)
Or maybe Dixon just knows how to write up
to the level of his artist and this work by John Van Fleet is just breathtaking. Its
a perfect mixture of watercolors and Photoshop like effects. It kind of reminds me of a
slick mutated version of Dave McKeans covers, except not quite so photorealistic.
(That's his art below.)
fr
The Chalice Story could be subtitled
Batman Meets the Holy Grail. As a practicing agnostic, I cant say that the topic
moved me, but hey, its a comic book. Dixon does a pretty nice job actually. The
story features all kinds of guest shots including Ras Al Ghul, Catwoman, the Penguin and
most interestingly to me, a kick ass Alfred. An Alfred that knows how to use a rifle and
defend himself. No prissy brit is this. In fact, in light of the rumors surrounding Batman
before Year One, it kind of makes sense. Alfred would be more of trainer and mentor.
Art is definitely the star here.
You have to see this to understand just
how fantastically drawn and well conceived this book is. In its way, its just as
groundbreaking as the previously published Veils. Van Fleet really throws out the
Photoshop skills on backgrounds. Id say at least half the backgrounds or more
feature scanned in cars, castles, lights and roads. If youre a student of these
kinds of graphic composition tools you can see the effects: Van Fleet adds
"noise" indiscriminately, tosses off a few "morphs" and you even
suspect that hes altering the way that "light" falls off of lamps or
within the glow of the Holy Grail.
Actually, and this is something very
interesting, I found myself wondering whether the whole thing wasnt photoshopped or
not, including the characters. I mean, I can take images and mess with them in such a way
that they look like comic images. Give me the high end stuff like a Photoshop and Painter
and I could probably pull off this comic, or something like it. You would just need models
to do it. Get some real guy you know to prance around like the Penguin, then snap and
shoot. The reason I suspect that is because whenever you heavily photoshop it mutes the
edges on photos or pictures or whatever. Shows up mostly in faces. If you observe the
faces in Chalice then you do notice that there are lines missing from their faces, which
is what happens to my art whenever I run it through one too many filters. Just a curious
thing that's all.
Bottom line, whether hand drawn all the
way or not, I highly recommend the book.
As for the other Batman book,
"Batman: War on Crime", it was pretty good too. Written by Paul Dini, the scribe
behind the wonderful Warner Brothers series "Batman Beyond" and drawn by
the now legendary Alex Ross, "Batman: War on Crime" is done in a Big Format
style, or 11 by 17.
It's kind of like last year's Big Superman
book and it highlights Ross' incredible style.
Needless to say, its beautiful to
look at. The remarkable aspect about Rosss art would have to his expressions.
Amazing the range of emotions he gets out of faces: rage, fear, alarm, and in Bruce Wayne
a kind of smug confidence. The most intense one was the picture of a young Bruce Wayne
vowing to avenge the deaths of his parents. You can practically feel that kids
seering eyes.
The story isnt bad either. Its
kind of an interesting speculation touched upon in Watchmen that asks: what is it that you
Masked People actually do. You come away feeling that he could do a lot more to help
people as Bruce Wayne. The other aspect to the writing thats very interesting has to
do with the first person narrative by Bruce Wayne. You come away thinking that Bruce is a
bit of a psychopath. Theres something dangerous about him. Hes not that far
away from sounding like Rorshach from the Watchmen series, which is probably pretty close
to what the truth would be. Dini does a pretty good job.

He also does something that I've always
loved about comics: It teaches you a very important lesson about the face of modern evil.
How it wears suits, engages in white collar crimes against the spirit and isn't dumb
enough to look right in the eyes of that 7-11 camera unmasked.
I would recommend this book as well. It's
just fantastically drawn.
The Son of Superman brings us the welcome
return of Howard Chaykin to comics. It might also be called Kingdom Come: The Chaykin
Elseworld Version. Of the graphic novel stories I've read, this one is a truly dense read:
it features a terrorist group called the Supermen, the disappearance of Superman, older
versions of your favorite characters--one of which is an astonishingly aged silverhaired
Batman--and an updated, orange ponytailed version Lex Luthor.
It's a terribly complicated story and for
those of us familiar with American Flagg that's probably no big surprise. It's gorgeously
drawn by Promothea artist J. H. Williams. It's beautiful to look at it and to read. The
story, as hard as it is to explain, has to do with the disappearance of Superman and the
subsequent changes to the world--most of them not so good. It features the rise of Lex
Luthor, a kind of vast discussion of the role of terrorism in world change, and a story
concluding fight that only fanboys could love featuring big duke outs between Superman vs.
the Martian Manhunter, Batman vs. the young Flash, and Wonder Woman vs. Aquaman. Makes you
wanna never grow up.
Chaykin didn't write this alone. He had
help from a prominent Hollywood screenwriter. It changed the weight of the story somewhat.
I'm guessing that the parts of the script that were kind of sentimental and aimed for a
particular demographic came from David Tischman..
Overall, an entertaining Postmodern comic
read, replete with fight scenes. I recommend it. The only thing I don't recommend is the
price. It goes for a very uncool $25 bucks or so. You shouldn't have to be a Microsoft
shareholder to buy this thing. That's called the "screwing" the younger, less
well off fan. Shame on you. And during the holidays too.
Where is your sense of charity DC?
Promethea 4 and 5, 4.7
out of 5 Stars
Neil Gaiman's "The
Sandman: The Dream Hunters", 3.6 out of 5 Stars
And now for something completely
different: Neil Gaiman's "The Sandman: The Dream Hunters"
I have a horrible confession to make: Of
the two great Brit writers that have conquered our shores, Gaiman and Alan Moore, I am
clearly in the Moore camp. I think Moore might be the most talented to ever enter the
comics field. That's unfortunate for Gaiman. It's like being a Physics theoretician at
about the time Einstein was rising on the scene.
His horrifically priced graphic novel
"The Dream Hunters" isn't bad. It's professionally done. In the interviews I've
read he was inspired to write it because of the Japanese myth he's been immersed in for
the last year or so as he wrote the Disney screenplay for Princess Mononoko.
For the record, I strongly recommend the
film. However, you could probably pass on the book. Even though both of these guys are
Brits, Moore and Gaiman have different approaches. Moore is intellectual, you sense that
Gaiman is intuitive and insular. Moore is political, where you don't ever get the sense
that politics plays a part in any of the worlds that Gaiman writes about.
Personally, I'm an intellectual
(self-defined) who is interested in politics.

Guess which writer I like the most?
Again, it's not that Dream Hunters is bad.
It features wonderful artwork by Yoshitaka Amano and it's readable. It's just not my
thing. If you're into Gaiman, you worship all of his Sandman stories for instance, then,
hey, go knock yourself out silly.
If, however, you're looking for something
truly transcendent, special and superior, then go pick up Promethea 1 through 5.
It works on so many levels. I have to
write something about the entirety of the ABC line. These are truly special comics.
But I truly think that Promethea is the
best of the lot. It's just wondrous. One of the attempted knocks at Watchman by Gary Groth
or whoever it was at the journal is that it was complicated, but not complex. Well,
apparently Moore heard the arguments and Promethea is both complicated and complex.
I'm really at a loss for words to describe
the high quality of this title. Let's put it this way: If I knocked on the doors of top
fantasists Clive Barker, Poppy Z. Brite, Jonathon Lethem and even my personal hero Harlan
Ellison and threw a bunch of Promethea books in their faces and dared them to match the
quality, I think they would sink to their knees, weeping, and humbly crawl away. Maybe
Gene Wolfe would be up to it or the late Borges. Maybe.
Not only is it interesting in that it
touches upon the idea of myth, it's interesting in that it creates its own world of myth.
In issues 4 and 5 you learn more about the world of Promethea, who like Peter Pan seems to
exist only if you believe in her. Issue four features Charles Vess doing a piece set in
1779, just a wonderful innovation--using different artists and different styles in the
middle of books--that Moore has used twice now in his ABC books, the first time was in a
Tom Strong issue where the middle of the book looked like an old EC book.
The one thing that you learn about the
Prometheas is that different people get to play her part throughout history and that she's
definitely vulnerable. All the Prometheas die, or at least have died and perhaps will die.
The plot is so complex that you find yourself asking more questions that are answered but
it sure is a great ride.
And oh the cool details. It's a world full
of Les Miserable posters, Achocalypse Pops, floating aircabs, Café Khaddaffi, a website
called "TEXTure", a Painted Doll (Moore's version of the Joker) tshirt that says
"1 million killed", flying bees that metamorph into flying tigers then running
tigers, bats with fabrics for wings, and superheroes whose tears turn into blue five point
stars. Wondrous, wondrous stuff. That one man is doing this book, Tom Strong, Top Ten and
other stuff constitutes a conspiracy of quality. How can such a high quality be maintained
with such quantity? Truly, its something unreal, something out of the Immateria itself.
Bottom Line: Promethea is probably the
best comic put out this year. Of course you should buy it.
|